Skip to main content

Case study · AI product interface development

From toxicology model to product: building DioScor’s usable front end

Consone AI had already established DioScor’s scientific foundation, predictive capability and commercial direction. The remaining challenge was product translation: turning complex, layered toxicology output into a credible front-end experience that scientific users, partners and prospective buyers could understand, interrogate and evaluate. Veda designed and developed that interface around Consone AI’s requirements and subject-matter expertise.

Client
Consone AI
Product
DioScor
Engagement
Front-end product translation, interface design and development
Status
Front-end delivery complete; awaiting go-live
DioScor toxicology prediction interface displayed in a laboratory setting

01

A strong scientific foundation needed a usable product layer

Consone AI had already assembled curated toxicity data from human and animal studies, developed the deep-learning capability behind organism-level predictions, and defined where DioScor should sit as a product. The model and proposition were not the missing pieces.

What remained was the software surface through which somebody could submit a compound, understand the result, inspect confidence and supporting evidence, and move through a coherent reporting journey without losing the scientific nuance underneath it.

02

The interface had to organise complex model output

A scientific AI interface cannot stop at presenting a prediction. DioScor needed to communicate cross-species and organ-level findings, confidence, structural attribution, biomarkers, mechanisms and known evidence without collapsing them into a false single answer.

The product also needed to distinguish curated source data from model output and keep the limits of prediction visible. DioScor supports interpretation; it does not replace regulatory testing or guarantee that a compound is safe.

  • Layered interpretationsummary first, with confidence and supporting detail available for inspection
  • Clear evidence boundariesknown compound evidence and model predictions remain visibly distinct
  • Responsible product languageuncertainty and the limits of prediction stay present in the experience
DioScor interface comparing toxicity predictions across species
The published DioScor product view for cross-species comparison and confidence review.

03

Product requirements became a structured user journey

Veda translated Consone AI’s product direction and subject-matter expertise into the front-end architecture: the information model, interaction flow, visual hierarchy and responsive implementation needed to make the capability usable.

The resulting journey moves from molecular input and exposure route through prediction summary, cross-species comparison, structural and mechanistic interpretation, weight of evidence and exportable reporting.

  • Interface architecturecomplex scientific information ordered around the decisions a user needs to make
  • Explainability presentationconfidence, attribution, mechanisms and evidence designed as product layers
  • Responsive front-end deliverythe defined experience implemented for demonstration, review and launch

04

Explainability became part of the interface architecture

DioScor’s interface is deliberately layered. A user can begin with the prediction summary and confidence, then move into organ-level risk, species comparison, molecular regions, biomarker pathways, mechanisms and similar compounds as more scrutiny is required.

That structure makes technical depth available without placing every result at the same visual level. It also treats explainability as a core interaction requirement rather than a disclaimer attached after the prediction.

DioScor interface presenting biomarker pathways and predicted mechanistic patterns
Mechanistic interpretation is presented as a distinct, inspectable layer of the product.

05

Evidence is available for review, not decoration

The weight-of-evidence view places a result alongside known compounds, molecular similarities, relevant species, endpoints and applicability information. Instead of asking a user to accept an isolated score, the product gives them a route into the material that supports interpretation.

That is especially important in scientific software: trust comes from showing how a result can be examined, where its confidence comes from and which questions remain outside the model’s scope.

DioScor weight-of-evidence interface showing similar compounds and applicability context
The weight-of-evidence view lets users inspect known compounds, similarity and supporting context.

06

A delivered front end with claims kept in bounds

Consone AI supplied the science, predictive model and product direction. Veda’s role was to turn those defined requirements into a structured, visual and reportable front-end experience, then deliver the responsive interface needed for demonstration, review and launch.

Front-end delivery is complete and the product is awaiting go-live. Until live evidence exists, this case study does not claim adoption, commercial performance or scientific outcomes. The proof is the product translation and implementation itself.

What this proves

Complex AI needs a front end people can understand and interrogate

DioScor demonstrates how defined scientific requirements and model outputs can become a responsible product experience without overstating the interface team’s role in the underlying science, strategy or evidence.

  • Scientific requirements translated into one coherent front-end journey
  • Complex model output made layered and available for inspection
  • Uncertainty and evidence treated as core interface requirements
  • Product design and responsive implementation delivered together

Have a defined AI product that needs a credible front end?

If the model and product direction are clear but users still need a way to understand, inspect and act on the output, we can turn those requirements into a responsive product interface built for demonstration, review and launch.